Forecasting by Analogy :

 

If a perfect forecast had been available as early as October 1996 (knowing what is now known about the actual impact), what could have been done differently?  (Do not take into consideration at this time any restrictions on possible actions.)

 

a.         About information flow?

 

Societies have “the propensity to prepare for the last climate anomaly by which they are affected” (Glantz 1988, 4). Current Ethiopian policy makers have constantly engaged in forecasting by analogy in the area of climate-related impacts to avoid repeating the 1973-74, 1980, 1984-85, 1987 and 1993-94 experiences that reduce food in varying degrees. However, they do it with imperfect information.

 

One of the problems with weather forecasting in Ethiopia is the lack of timely and reliable information. As mentioned earlier, traditional meteorological information on the various Ethiopian climatic zones is not available. If there were perfect information available about the arrival of El Niño as early October 1996, there would have been more time between the dispatch of information to the users and the actual impact. In the case of Ethiopia, the season that was impacted was the Meher season when plantation of long maturing crops begins as early as April and May. With El Niño information that had about nine months of lead time, the Ethiopian Early Warning System could have had the time to spread the word to the regions and the villages.

 

The lack of perfect information forces the NMSA to delay its forecast. In 1997, for example, it heard about the El Niño in March, but issued the weather forecast at the end of May 1997. We can even argue that the May forecast does not have much utility for those farmers who plan to plant long maturing crops. Mr. Ibrahim Mohammed, Head of the Extension Department of the Ministry of Agriculture, stated that “the forecast usually comes at the beginning of the sowing season with no time gap to prepare any counter measures to counter the drought.” The NMSA sends its forecast at the end of May after the drought has already affected the first or second stage of the planting process. [1]   The late arrival of early warning information was also one of the main complaints of the Early Warning Officers in Tigray Region. Thus, there is very little time left for the National Early Warning System to meet, study how to respond, and reach the farmers and herders, who are the main users in Ethiopia.

 

If we examine the time frame between the 1997 El Niño-based forecast in Ethiopia and the flow of information based on our information from the Tigray Regional State, we find that more than a month had elapsed before the Wereda level functionaries held their first meeting. The NMSA forecast was released on May 29, 1997 and, they received the NMSA forecast at the end of June. On July 8 1997 they gathered the entire zone Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Department heads of the region for a briefing. The latter returned to their zones and briefed the Wereda Early Warning Committee members that have direct contact with farmers and herders. Thus, it took a minimum of approximately five weeks for the information to flow between the NMSA forecast and the briefing of the Zone Early Warning Committee by the Regions. In Tigray, the Regional Early Warning Committees and the Zone EWC met every two weeks to report about events and to evaluate the response until the impact of the drought was over. These activities were emergency in nature due to the late arrival of the forecast from the NMSA. Perfect information in October 1996 could have given much needed time to study the problem and choose the best alternative responses. The information could have reached the farmers long before the beginning of the planting season so that they could decide what alternate actions to take. Perfect information could have also have also created credibility between the users of information, such as the farmers and the distributors of information, such as the local development agent. The development agent meets with the farmers even when the information he delivers is wrong.

 

b.         About preparing for the forecast impacts?

 

Lack of access by Ethiopians to water, infrastructure, markets, information and inputs are the most important constraints that are exacerbated during drought. With perfect forecast information many months ahead of time, the society could focus all of its energy and deal with the above problems. It could dig or construct dams in all parts of the country to prepare for the impact. Drought resistant seeds could be identified and collected for later distribution for farmers. There would also be time to pass the information on how to cope with the impact. Farmers would also get advice on where and when to plant their crops. This would reduce their lost energy and seeds that are used for planting and replanting. One of the pieces of advice from the Ministry of Agriculture to farmers in 1997 was to replant crops. This is hardly any support as farmers have been doing this all the time.

 

 As stated earlier, the Ethiopian government advised farmers to adapt to the nature of the weather and reduce losses by planting drought-adaptive crops. It also mobilized and distributed resources. However, time is a very important factor for the successful implementation of both. A forecast with a lead time of more than six months would have given the farmer and the government ample time to communicate and implement their responses. The responses would not have the tone of an emergency. As stated by Mr. Ibrahim of the Ministry of Agriculture, Ethiopian forecasts usually come after the beginning of the planting season even for the fast maturing crops. Table 9 shows the planting and harvesting time of some of the crops in the Tigray region of Ethiopia at the beginning of the Kiremt season. Table 9 does not include the long maturing crops, such as maize, sorghum, sigem hagai, taff Ginbot (May teff) etc.

Table 9. Planting and Harvesting Dates

 

Crop variety

 

Plant

 

Harvest

 

Barley  Tsa'idaa sigem

        Sa-isa'a

 

June 25-July 2

July 8-July 15

 

Sept 11-Oct 10

Sept 11-Oct 10

 

Wheat  Ashihaan                        Desaalegn                       Tselim sindaay                  Ayiqurtem     

 

June 8-June 15

July 8-July 22   

July 22-Aug  

6 Aug   7-Sept 6

 

 Sept 11-Oct 10         Oct 11-Nov 9         Nov 10-Dec 9         Dec   2-Dec 9

 

Oats   'Ares       

 

Aug 7-Aug 15             

 

Nov 10-Dec 9

 

Flax   Intati       

 

June 8-Aug   6             

 

 90 days later   

 

Legumes Inguayaa

 

Sept 1-Sept 7              

 

Nov   1-Nov 10          

 

Chick pea Shimbraa      

 

Sept 6-Sept 10

 

Nov 10-Dec 9 

 

 Source: Bauer (1976, 71).

 

Mr. Ibrahim stated that if “we were to get the El Niño or La Niña information a few months ahead of the beginning of the farming process for that season, we could cope and reduce the drought impact.” He also added  “anything you do to prepare for drought does not hurt.” Some of the actions that can be taken to reduce the impact of drought are creating dams, saving seeds, and buying food. These are actions that are helpful to the society and the country even under normal weather conditions. The worst thing is “to sleep idle saying that there is no drought.” Mr. Ibrahim stressed that Ethiopia needs to stop “working in the form of emergency or relief and deal with the drought problem in a planned manner.”

 

Therefore, a longer time frame between forecast and action introduces the idea of planning. With time, people could be encouraged to introduce the diversification of crops. He wants to “shift from annual cereals to other crops, such as vegetables,” which are dismally absent in Ethiopia. The opportunities created by the drought should be used to change the culture of the people in order introduce the gardening culture into their activities. Mr. Ibrahim cited the case of the bumper potato harvest in Debre-Berhan, which was not subsequently followed by the farmers because it is not a culture that is interested in eating potatoes.

 

The Ministry of Agriculture official stated that “access to perfect information with many months of lead time would help us to advise our nomads to convert their cattle into other forms of property, instead of waiting until the drought comes and forces them to sell their livestock cheaply.” The extra lead-time could have given the herders time to sell their animals.


One of the problems of imperfect information is the tendency for trial and error. If there were perfect information, the Head of the Tigray Regional State Early Warning Department, Mr. Hadera said, “The region could have done more than what it did in 1997.” The canals and water harvesting holes could have been built extensively, and drought resistant seeds could have been selected in advance. He said that it would have also been possible to sell animals before they starved to death.

 

A perfect forecast for the 1997-98 El Niño, as early as October 1996, could have been an incentive for the government and farmers to spend more resources on the post-harvest lose [losses] (?) of Ethiopian agriculture in 1996, which was a record production-year. In addition, Ethiopia would not have exported some of its 1996-97 surplus food production to the neighboring countries. It would have stockpiled it for the period of food deficit in 1997 and 1998. The 170,000 MT food exports were going on in March 1997, two months earlier than the NMSA forecast of May 29, 1997 (Addis Zemen July 4, 1997 or Sene 24, 1991 EC). In March 1997, there were two contradictory news items in Addis Zemen. One referred to food exports and the other to the possibility of food insecurity in the country. Additional El Nino information about the possibility of the failure of the Kiremt rainfall would have lent additional information to policy-makers that the food insecurity that might be witnessed would reach disaster proportions. Donors were also depleting the successful Ethiopian Emergency Food Security Reserve in Ethiopia because of loans, for their programs in the neighboring countries as well as Ethiopia, since the beginning of 1997. The Food Security Reserves should not have been opened until the impact of the 1997-98 El Niño was clear. When it was a necessity to get food later in 1997-98, it was depleted and there was very little reserve food for emergency. Donors could have been very careful before they borrowed grains from the Food Reserves. It could have also been possible to buy more food from the surplus producing areas and increase the capacity of the reserves. At this time, food was very cheap because of the record harvest in Ethiopia. Thus, if a perfect weather forecast was available ahead of time, the government could use the information to manage the import and export of food crops, as well as manage land use policies and advise farmers on what, when and where to farm.  If there had been perfect information about El Niño and its impact on Ethiopia, the government would not have been in emergency mode to tackle the problem.

 

Credible and perfect forecasting could also lead farmers to re-organize their annual agricultural activities and household budgets. They could manage their resources by reducing non-mandatory expenditures, such as weddings and feasts in order to save for the expected reduction in food. With this information, farmers could have saved their drought resistant crops, such as chickpeas. The price of such crops rocketed by 300 percent in some areas in 1997. Others could have sold their animals before the prices were depressed and bought food when it was cheap. With accurate information on drought, many farmers would not waste their energy and seeds. Others reported that they could have looked for non-farm activities, such as petty trade or construction, to supplement the expected reduction in output.

 

What are the realistic obstacles that might have prevented these theoretical actions?

 

Effective response to drought is related to development. Ethiopia is frequently impacted by climate hazards because its crop and animal production are dependent on rainfall and natural resources. The contribution of irrigated agriculture in Ethiopia to the food system is insignificant. The Ethiopian market is not integrated, and cattle herders in Ethiopia have a mobile wealth that is destroyed by a single drought. Thus, even under normal weather conditions, the people are confronted with widespread poverty. What is absent under normal conditions is the mass famine and death as a result of starvation.

 

Therefore, the various actions that ought to have been taken to reduce the impact should be seen within the contours of the government’s capacity to finance and develop the various possible actions to counter the impact. Even under normal conditions, the Ethiopian government has been encouraging farmers to get involved in development activities relating to soil and water conservation. This is done through terracing and the construction of micro-dams. Even if financing were available from external sources, there might not be the capacity to implement it in between six and nine months.

 

An important constraint regarding the implementation of the ideal El Niño forecast is the fact that it will still be difficult to provide accurate information at the local level. Many farmers in Tigray were angry at the forecast that the rains would start late because, in some areas, the rains began as normal. However, some farmers did not use the opportunity because of the advice they received from the government. Thus, unless the relationship of El Niño with the local climate is definitely stated, it would be problematic to give specific warning to farmers about the timing of rains.

 

Ethiopian governments in the past did not have the institutional capacity or the desire to forecast droughts. In such cases, it is not useful to have perfect information about the future if you are neither interested nor willing to prevent it. In 1973-74, the Monarchy had the resources to respond to the hungry people in northern Ethiopia by providing relief. At this time, there were stocks of grain in the country. But the government did not consider that as its job. In fact, it considered drought and famine as an act of God that was going to happen once in a while. It is alleged that the government knew about the disaster but hid it in order not to tarnish the “image” of the Emperor of Ethiopia.

 

Government commitment, access to information, and the viability of its institutions, infrastructure and resources are important elements in the success of forecasting by analogy. The information required includes knowledge about previous disasters in the country and the lessons learnt in dealing with them. Availability of effective societal institutions, such as an effective and stable government, manpower, and infrastructure and material resources are some of the important components of effective response. It should be noted that planning for the future based on the unknown is a very difficult task for any government, especially when it requires spending scarce resources.

 

Current Ethiopian leaders have learned from past experience to cope with future droughts. In 1997, for example, the government at the highest level gave instructions and follow-up meetings to all concerned institutions in order to respond to the imminent disaster. This would minimize or prevent its impact. They learned from the past and avoided those strategies that were not effective. The response to the 1997 drought was effective because the government had been working to build institutions with the objective of preventing disasters. The sole objective of the Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Commission (DPPC) is to provide early warning and organize response to disasters. It has learnt from the disasters of 1972 and 1984-85. It also learned from the floods of 1996 and put in infrastructure to prevent the 1997 anomalous floods. It also learned to apply the various traditional and modern agronomic techniques of farming to reduce the impact of below-normal rainfall.

 

One of the beliefs of the current Ethiopian policy makers regarding disaster response is the use of local manpower and resources. The preventative responses should be done at the local level so that people can learn for the future. Food should be distributed at the village level to avoid distress at migration relief camps. The expansion of food security reserves is something that evolved from past experiences. The DPPC makes its appeals to the local and international community by telling them that unless they donate in time, the conditions of the past (i.e. 1973-74 and 1984-85) could return again.

 

Can El Niño considerations be added explicitly to national disaster plans?

 

The amount of information discovered on the relationship between El Niño and climate variability in Ethiopia needs to be explicitly included into the national disaster plan. As we saw previously, the National Meteorological Services Agency has been issuing weather forecasts based on El Niño information.

 

However, the extent of awareness on the part of the population about El Niño is very small. As we know, the various disaster management documents, such as the five-year Plan of the DPPC, do not even mention El Niño as a hazard. Such explicit inclusion would have made people aware of the dangers, and they could respond to future disasters accordingly. An explicit consideration can be useful because, when El Niño is on the scene, different organizations in the private and public sectors could plan their responses without waiting for the government. Importers and exporters, hydroelectric distributors and livestock traders could take mitigating actions on their own before the onset of El Niño.

 

Ethiopia has been a food deficit country even at the end of 1996-97, when there was a record harvest. The causes for this kind of food insecurity include over-population and lack of productivity of the agricultural sector. A timely and credible El Niño-based forecast is important for a government with perennial food insecurity because of the severity of climate-related disaster. It is believed that there was no indication that donors and NGOs were using El Niño information for program planning for the year 1998 (Thompson, et. al. 1998, 99). This probably was due to their continuous involvement in food aid, even outside El Niño years.

 

Identify the strengths and weaknesses in the way Ethiopia's government system responds to El Niño-related climate anomalies.

 

Ethiopia has a wide experience in disaster management. It has a network of institutions, such as the NMSA, the DPPC and various disaster prevention and preparedness committees at all levels of government, from the Wereda to the Office of the Prime Minister. The DPPC is an established agency that assesses the needs of people impacted by a disaster and mobilizes and distributes relief. The relationship between the government and non-governmental organizations involved in relief and development has been improving from time to time. There is a political will on the part of the government to mitigate drought and floods in the country. Ethiopia has also been able to establish good relations with donors after the replacement of the former Military Government in 1991.

 

The issuance of forecasts close to the plantation period is a visible weakness of the use of El Niño in Ethiopia. The Ministry of Agriculture, for example, complains that El Niño-based forecasts from the NMSA usually coincide with the period of the cultivation of crops, which makes early response to the impact of the climate anomaly on the crops quite difficult. For example, to those farmers who planned to plant long maturing crops, the early warning on May 29, 1997 was late by one month. As the example of the Tigray National State shows, although the NMSA forecast was released on May 29, the first meeting of the regional Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Committee was on July 8, 1997. We were informed that the Tigray Regional Early Warning Committee met two weeks after the information arrived in the region from the head office in Addis Ababa. In July, the rainy season had already started and the information was hardly a drought early warning (Hadera 2000). The Tigray region tried to do everything possible in spite of the contradictory information they were getting about the weather outlook.

 

Ethiopia also needs scientific models regarding the relationship between El Niño and Ethiopian weather for various local areas. Ethiopia has a diverse local climate, but it does not have accumulated meteorological information. There is also a lack of trained manpower, especially at the regional level.

 

The existence of a policy framework for inter-departmental collaboration of the committees is limited at the local level due to a lack of common understanding of the issues (DPPC 1998a, 6). In its periodic evaluations, the NDPPC has reached the conclusion that some members of the early warning committee consider this task as secondary to their departmental work. This was despite the provision of a clear mandate by the government on the importance of inter-departmental cooperation on early warning and preparedness. The DPPC states that a lack of a skilled and experienced work force at the local level hinders the implementation of policies related to climate-related impacts. There is also lack of research interest outside the DPPC and NMSA. There is no ongoing research at the universities about El Niño. There is also little awareness of El Niño by the media or the public.

 

Ethiopia is vulnerable to the legacy of decades of civil conflict, land mines, over-population, and lack of agricultural productivity, which can change one season’s abnormal rainfall into a disaster. The number of people affected by drought disaster in Ethiopia is usually in the millions, which makes it difficult for the Ethiopian people and government to respond from its internal resources only.



[1] The long maturing crops in Ethiopia are usually planted starting from April and May, depending on the type of crop and the availability of rainfall.